文章摘要
赵杰,曾杰,邹瑜聪,曾嘉玲,罗伟,周玉兰,苏丹铌,汤晓青,潘东梅,苏启表,王晓玉.PBL联合OTD双轨教学模式在康复功能评定学教学中的应用[J].中国康复,2020,35(1):54-56
PBL联合OTD双轨教学模式在康复功能评定学教学中的应用
Application of PBL combined of OTD Double track Teaching Mode in Functional Assessment of Rehabilitation Teaching
  
DOI:
中文关键词: PBL教学模式  OTD教学模式  康复功能评定学
英文关键词: PBL teaching  OTD teaching  Functional Assessment of Rehabilitation
基金项目:1广东药科大学2017年教育教学改革项目(No. 18);2 中华医学会项目(No. 2016B-FF093);3 广东药科大学“创新强校工程”资助项目、广东省教育科学“十三五”规划项目(No. 2018GXJK078);4广东药科大学大学生创新创业训练计划项目(No. 201710573007,201810573004S)
作者单位
赵杰 1. 广东药科大学广州 5100002.广东省光与健康工程技术研究中心广州 510000 
曾杰 广东药科大学广州 510000 
邹瑜聪 广东药科大学广州 510000 
曾嘉玲 广东药科大学广州 510000 
罗伟 广东药科大学广州 510000 
周玉兰 广东药科大学广州 510000 
苏丹铌 广东药科大学广州 510000 
汤晓青 广东药科大学广州 510000 
潘东梅 南方医科大学中医药学院 广州 510000 
苏启表 广东药科大学广州 510000 
王晓玉 1. 广东药科大学广州 5100002.广东省光与健康工程技术研究中心广州 510000 
摘要点击次数: 8544
全文下载次数: 4871
中文摘要:
  目的:探讨问题导向学习(PBL)联合临床先导散学法(OTD)双轨教学模式在康复功能评定学教学中的应用效果。方法:选择康复治疗学专业2016级1班、2班的学生各60名,1班采用传统教学模式,设为对照组;2班采用PBL联合OTD双轨教学模式,设为观察组。课程结束后,通过2组学生实践技能考核成绩和理论考试成绩来评价教学效果,发放问卷调查评估学生对教学的满意度情况。结果:观察组在理论考试的选择应用、简答应用及病例分析3项中得分均明显高于对照组(均P<0.05);观察组理论考试和实践技能考核的优秀率和总成绩均明显高于对照组(P<0.05,0.01);观察组的总体满意度和除团队协作能力以外的6个项目方面的满意度均高于对照组(P<0.05,0.01)。结论: PBL联合OTD双轨教学模式能提高学生学习成绩和对教学的满意度,有效提高教学质量。
英文摘要:
  Objective: To explore the application of PBL+OTD dual track teaching mode in the teaching of Functional Assessment of Rehabilitation. Methods: Sixty students of class 1 and 60 students of class 2 at 2016 grade whose major in rehabilitation therapy were selected. The former was treated as the control group with the traditional teaching mode, and the latter was treated as the experimental group with PBL+OTD dual track teaching mode. After the course was over, the practical skills and theoretical examination scores of two groups were compared to evaluate the teaching effect, and questionnaire surveys were used to assess the students' satisfaction with the teaching. Results: The scores of the treatment group in the choice and application of the theoretical test, short answer application, and medical record analysis were significantly higher than those in the control group (all P<0.05). The excellent rate and total time of the theoretical examination and practical skills assessment of the treatment group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05, 0.01). The overall satisfaction of the treatment group and the satisfaction of the 6 items except the team collaboration ability were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05, 0.01). Conclusion: PBL+OTD dual track teaching mode may improve students' academic performance and their satisfaction with teaching, and also effectively improve teaching effect.
查看全文   下载PDF阅读器  HTML全文
关闭
本刊微信二维码