文章摘要
孙玮,赵晨光,牟翔,刘卫,袁华.低频重复经颅磁刺激治疗脑卒中患者上肢痉挛的临床研究[J].中国康复,2017,32(2):102-105
低频重复经颅磁刺激治疗脑卒中患者上肢痉挛的临床研究
Clinical study of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of upper limb spasm in patients with stroke
  
DOI:
中文关键词: 重复经颅磁刺激  脑卒中  上肢  痉挛  皮层兴奋性
英文关键词: rTMS  stroke  spasticity  upper limb  cortical excitability
基金项目:国家国际合作项目(2013DFA32610);陕西省国际科技合作与交流计划项目(2015KW-035)
作者单位
孙玮 第四军医大学西京医院康复理疗科西安 710032 
赵晨光 第四军医大学西京医院康复理疗科西安 710032 
牟翔 第四军医大学西京医院康复理疗科西安 710032 
刘卫 第四军医大学西京医院康复理疗科西安 710032 
袁华 第四军医大学西京医院康复理疗科西安 710032 
摘要点击次数: 7521
全文下载次数: 4898
中文摘要:
  目的:观察低频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)对脑卒中患者上肢痉挛状态、运动功能的治疗效果。方法:将脑卒中恢复期上肢痉挛的患者40例随机分为真刺激组及假刺激组各20例。所有患者给予常规物理治疗,真刺激组给予低频重复经颅磁刺激(1Hz),作用于非患侧大脑M1区上肢投射区。假刺激组给予假刺激,作用部位与真刺激组相同。于治疗开始前,治疗4周结束时及治疗结束后2周随访时进行评估。评估内容包括改良Ashworth痉挛评定(MAS)、上肢Fugl-Meyer运动功能评定(ULFMA)、Barthel指数(BI)、运动诱发电位(MEP)和上肢F波潜伏时及波幅。结果:治疗后及随访时,真刺激组腕屈及肘屈MAS评分均较治疗前及同时间点假刺激组显著降低(均P<0.05),真刺激组ULFMA及BI评分较治疗前及同时间点假刺激组显著提高(均P<0.05),假刺激组MAS、ULFMA及BI评分治疗前后差异均无统计学意义。治疗后及随访时,真刺激组MEP潜伏时较治疗前及假刺激组显著缩短,波幅提高(均P<0.05),假刺激组治疗前后比较差异无统计学意义。治疗前后,F波在所有受试者均被引出,出波率100%。2组患者F波潜伏时、波幅组内及组间比较均无显著性差异。结论:低频重复经颅磁刺激可减轻脑卒中患者上肢痉挛,其作用机制可能与其提高了患侧大脑M1区上肢投射区的皮层兴奋性有关。
英文摘要:
  Objective: To observe the effects of the repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on spasticity and motor function of the patients with stroke. Methods: A total of 40 inpatients with stroke were randomly divided into treatment group and sham group. All patients received conventional rehabilitation intervention. In the treatment group, 20 patients received 1 Hz rTMS over the contralesional motor cortex (unaffected side), and 20 patients in sham group received sham stimulation. Two groups were treated once a day, 6 times a week, a total of 4 weeks of treatment. All outcomes were assessed at the beginning of the treatment (T0), at the end of the 4th-week treatment (T1) and at the end of the 2nd-week follow-up (T2). Both groups were assessed with Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Upper Limb Fugl-Meyer Assessment (ULFMA), Barthel Index (BI), Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) and upper limb F wave. Results: After treatment for 4 weeks, MAS scores were significantly decreased, and BI and ULFMA scores were significantly increased in the treatment group (P<0.05). Moreover, the effects lasted for more than 2 weeks after the end of the final intervention. The amplitude of MEP in treatment group was significantly higher than that in the sham group (P<0.05). But no significant difference was found in MEP at T2. There was no significant difference between the two groups in F wave amplitude and latency. Conclusion: Low frequency rTMS can decrease the upper limb spasticity of patients with stroke. The possible mechanisms might be related to the positive changes of the cortical excitability in affected hemisphere.
查看全文   下载PDF阅读器  HTML全文
关闭
本刊微信二维码