黄礼群,王晓红,张善纲,徐丹,程慈,兰雪峰,童春梅,朱文涛.冲击波与超声波疗法治疗创伤后膝关节功能障碍的疗效比较[J].中国康复,2019,34(10):525-528 |
冲击波与超声波疗法治疗创伤后膝关节功能障碍的疗效比较 |
Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy vs. ultrasound treatments for post-traumatic knee dysfunction |
|
DOI: |
中文关键词: 创伤后膝关节功能障碍 冲击波治疗 超声波治疗 |
英文关键词: Post-traumatic knee dysfunction Extracorporeal shock wave therapy Ultrasound therapy |
基金项目: |
|
摘要点击次数: 9199 |
全文下载次数: 5839 |
中文摘要: |
 目的:比较冲击波和超声波治疗创伤后膝关节功能障碍的疗效。方法:60例单侧创伤后膝关节功能障碍患者被随机分成2组,冲击波组和超声波组各30例。2组均给予综合康复治疗(关节松动术、肌力训练和冷疗)。冲击波组增加冲击波治疗,每周2次,共8次。超声波组增加超声波治疗,每天1次,每周5天,共20次。在治疗前、治疗4周后评估患者的疼痛视觉模拟(VAS)评分、膝关节被动关节活动度(ROM)和膝关节功能(HSS)评分。结果:治疗4周后,2组患者VAS评分均较治疗前明显下降(均P<0.01),膝关节ROM和HSS评分均较治疗前明显增加(均P<0.05);治疗后2组间比较,冲击波组的VAS评分比超声波组明显降低(P<0.01),膝关节ROM和HSS评分均较超声波组有明显增加(均P<0.01)。结论:对于创伤后膝关节功能障碍的患者,冲击波治疗可以比超声波治疗更好地缓解关节疼痛,有效增加膝关节关节活动度和改善膝关节功能。 |
英文摘要: |
Objective: To compare the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) vs. ultrasound (US) in the treatment of post-traumatic knee dysfunction. Methods: A total of 60 patients with post-traumatic unilateral knee dysfunction were randomly assigned to 2 groups: ESWT group and US group. All patients were given a rehabilitation method including joint mobilization, strength training and cold therapy. ESWT group received ESWT for 8 sessions twice per week. US group received US for 20 sessions. The patients were evaluated before and 4 weeks after treatment. Measurements were made using visual analogue scale (VAS), passive range of motion (ROM) and hospital for special surgery knee score (HSS). Results:Both groups showed significant improvements in terms of VAS (P<0.01), passive ROM (P<0.01) and HSS (P<0.01) after treatment. The VAS scores in the ESWT group were reduced significantly as compared with those in the US group (P<0.01). The ROM and HSS scores in the ESWT group increased significantly as compared with those in the US group (P<0.01). Conclusion: It is suggested ESWT is significantly more effective than US in the treatment of post-traumatic knee dysfunction. |
查看全文
下载PDF阅读器 HTML全文 |
关闭 |