| 徐翠香,孙昊,沈文宾,周婉琼,胡玉芳,李恩耀.个体化经颅磁刺激方案对孤独症合并睡眠障碍患儿的干预效果观察[J].中国康复,2023,38(4):195-199 |
| 个体化经颅磁刺激方案对孤独症合并睡眠障碍患儿的干预效果观察 |
| Intervention effect of individualized transcranial magnetic stimulation program on children with autism complicated with sleep disorder |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 颅磁刺激 孤独症 睡眠障碍 干预效果 事件相关电位 |
| 英文关键词: transcranial magnetic stimulation autism sleep disturbance intervention effect event-related potential |
| 基金项目:河南省自然科学基金（212300410399） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 3678 |
| 全文下载次数: 8252 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：探讨个体化经颅磁刺激方案对孤独症合并睡眠障碍患儿的干预效果。方法：选取90例孤独症合并睡眠障碍患儿，随机分为对照组与观察组各45例。2组均接受常规康复治疗，对照组在常规治疗的基础上实施常规重复经颅磁刺激（rTMS）治疗，观察组依据患儿的事件相关电位（ERP）的检查结果进行个体化rTMS治疗；采用儿童孤独症评定量表（CARS）、孤独症治疗评估表（ATEC）、儿童睡眠习惯调查问卷（CSHQ）以及家庭睡眠习惯调查表（FISH）比较2组的干预效果。结果：与治疗前相比，2组患儿治疗后CARS、ATEC评分均显著降低（均P＜0.05），且观察组的CARS、ATEC评分均显著低于对照组（均P＜0.05）；与治疗前相比，2组患儿治疗后CSHQ评分显著降低（均P＜0.05），FISH评分显著增加（均P＜0.05），且观察组的CSHQ评分显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），FISH评分显著高于对照组（P＜0.05）。结论：根据ERP结果进行个体化rTMS治疗方案对ASD合并睡眠障碍患儿的干预效果优于常规rTMS治疗。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective: To investigate the intervention effect of individualized transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on children with autism complicated with sleep disorder. Methods: A total of 90 children with autism complicated with sleep disorder were randomly divided into control group (n=45) and observation group (n=45) by a random number table method.Both groups received routine rehabilitation treatment. The control group was treated with routine repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on the basis of routine treatment, and the observation group was treated with individualized rTMS according to the results of event-related potential (ERP). Children’s Autism Rating Scale (CARS), Autism Treatment Evaluation Scale (ATEC), Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) and Family Sleep Habits Questionnaire (FISH) were used to compare and analyze the intervention effect between the two groups.Results: Compared with those before the treatment, the autism -related CARS and ATEC scores in two groups after treatment were significantly decreased (P<0.05), and the CARS and ATEC scores in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). Compared with those before treatment, the sleep-related CSHQ scores in the two groups after treatment were significantly decreased (P<0.05), and the FISH scores were significantly increased (P<0.05), and the CSHQ scores in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05), and the FISH scores in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: The intervention effect of individualized rTMS treatment plan based on ERP results in children with autism complicated with sleep disturbance is better than that of conventional rTMS treatment. |
|
查看全文
下载PDF阅读器 HTML全文 |
| 关闭 |
