文章摘要
耿健,娄田,刘萍萍,苟琳,孙爱梅.脑电仿生电刺激联合常规康复治疗轻中度智力障碍儿童效果观察[J].中国康复,2024,39(9):530-533
脑电仿生电刺激联合常规康复治疗轻中度智力障碍儿童效果观察
Therapeutic effectiveness of bionic electrical stimulation combined with conventional rehabilitation for mild and moderate intellectual disability in children
  
DOI:10.3870/zgkf.2024.09.004
中文关键词: 脑电仿生电刺激  轻中度智力障碍
英文关键词: bionic electrical stimulation  mild and moderate intellectual disability
基金项目:
作者单位
耿健 遵义医投康复医院儿童康复科贵州 遵义 563000 
娄田 遵义医投康复医院儿童康复科贵州 遵义 563000 
刘萍萍 遵义医投康复医院儿童康复科贵州 遵义 563000 
苟琳 遵义医投康复医院儿童康复科贵州 遵义 563000 
孙爱梅 遵义医投康复医院儿童康复科贵州 遵义 563000 
摘要点击次数: 464
全文下载次数: 479
中文摘要:
  目的:研究脑电仿生电刺激联合常规康复治疗轻、中度智力障碍儿童的疗效。方法:将60例轻、中度智力障碍儿童随机分为2组各30例。对照组患儿采用我科常规综合康复治疗,观察组在对照组的基础上采用脑电仿生电刺激,2组患儿均治疗3个月。比较2组治疗前后0~6岁儿童神经心理发育量表(儿心量表)各项评分,婴儿-初中生社会生活能力量表(S-M)各项评分及临床疗效。结果:治疗后2组儿心量表评分均高于干预前(P<0.05),且观察组患儿大运动、适应能力、社交、发育商评分均高于对照组(P<0.05),2组精细动作及语言评分比较差异无统计学意义;治疗后,观察组S-M量表各项评分均较治疗前提高(P<0.01),且S-M量表中患儿独立生活、运动、作业操作、交往、集体活动、粗分及标准分评分均高于对照组(P<0.05),2组自我管理评分比较差异无统计学意义;对照组S-M量表中运动、集体活动、自我管理及粗分等评分均较治疗前明显提高(P<0.05),独立生活、作业操作、交往及标准分治疗前后比较差异无统计学意义。治疗后,观察组总有效率高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:脑电仿生电刺激联合常规康复可有效改善轻、中度智力障碍患儿智能及社会生活能力,促进患儿康复。
英文摘要:
  Objective: To study the therapeutic effectiveness of bionic electrical stimulation combined with routine rehabilitation for children with mild and moderate intellectual disability. Methods: A total of 60 children with mild and moderate intellectual disability were randomly divided into 2 groups (30 cases in each group). Children in the control group were treated with the conventional comprehensive rehabilitation, and those in the observation group were treated with the bionic electrical stimulation on the basis of the control group. The children in both groups were treated for 3 months. The scores of the 0 to 6 each score neuropsychological development scale before and after treatment and the scores and clinical efficacy of infant-junior high school students social living ability scale score (S-M) were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. Results: After treatment, the scores of the 0 to 6 each score neuropsychological development scale were higher than those before intervention (P<0.05). The scores of gross motor, adaptive capacity, social contact and developmental quotient of children in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05), and there was no statistically significant difference in fine motor and language scores between the two groups. After treatment, the scores of S-M scale in the observation group were increased as compared with those before treatment (P<0.01), and those of independent living, exercise, operation, communication, group activity, raw score and standard score in S-M scale in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in self-management scores between the two groups. The scores of exercise, group activity, self-management and raw scores in the S-M scale of the control group were significantly increased as compared with those before treatment (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in independent living, operation, communication and standard score before and after treatment. After treatment, the total effective rate in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: The bionic electrical stimulation combined with routine rehabilitation is capable of effectively improving the intelligence and social life ability of children with mild and moderate intellectual disability and promoting their rehabilitation.
查看全文   下载PDF阅读器  HTML全文
关闭
本刊微信二维码