| 夏群英,刘芳,王海兰,马灵云,胡秀笼.体外电磁刺激联合提肛训练治疗阴道松弛症的临床疗效[J].中国康复,2026,41(3):168-171 |
| 体外电磁刺激联合提肛训练治疗阴道松弛症的临床疗效 |
| Clinical efficacy of joint of extracorporeal electromagnetic stimulation and anal lifting exercise in treating vaginal laxity syndrome |
| |
| DOI：10.3870/zgkf.2026.03.008 |
| 中文关键词: 阴道松弛症 体外电磁刺激 提肛训练 性生活质量 盆底肌力 |
| 英文关键词: vaginal laxity syndrome extracorporeal electromagnetic stimulation anal lifting exercise quality of sexual life pelvic floor muscle strength |
| 基金项目:衡水市科技局项目（2024014033Z） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 221 |
| 全文下载次数: 146 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：探讨体外电磁刺激联合提肛训练治疗阴道松弛症（VLS）的效果，及对患者盆底肌肌电压、血清松弛素等指标的影响。方法：选取本院VLS患者190例，随机分为对照组和观察组各95例。对照组采用提肛训练疗法，观察组在对照组基础上加用体外电磁刺激疗法。比较2组总有效率、盆底肌力、盆底肌肌电压、阴道松弛情况、性生活质量、血清指标。结果：治疗3个月后，2组Ⅰ/Ⅱ类肌纤维肌电压、静息肌力、阴道松弛问卷（VLQ）评分、慢肌肌力、性生活质量问卷（SLQQ）评分、快肌肌力、女性性功能量表（FSFI）评分较治疗前显著升高（P<0.05），且观察组显著高于对照组（P<0.05）；治疗后，2组血清松弛素（RLX）水平较治疗前显著降低（P<0.05），且观察组显著低于对照组（P<0.05）；治疗后，观察组总有效率显著高于对照组(93.68%、78.95%，P<0.05）。结论：VLS患者接受体外电磁刺激+提肛训练联合方案干预，可有效提高其性生活质量，改善阴道松弛状况，具有一定临床应用价值。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective: To investigate the effect of extracorporeal electromagnetic stimulation+anal lifting exercise on vaginal laxity syndrome (VLS), and its impacts on pelvic floor muscle voltage, serum indicators, and other parameters in patients. Methods: Totally, 190 VLS patients were collected from our hospital and were randomly classified into a control group and an observation group. The control group was given anal lifting exercise therapy, while the observation group was subjected to additional extracorporeal electromagnetic stimulation. The total effective rate, pelvic floor muscle strength, pelvic floor muscle voltage, vaginal relaxation, sexual quality of life, and serum indicators were compared. Results: After treatment, the muscle voltage of type I/II muscle fibers, resting muscle strength, vaginal relaxation questionnaire (VLQ) score, slow muscle strength, quality of life questionnaire (SLQQ) score, fast muscle strength, and female sexual function scale (FSFI) score in both groups were significantly increased compared with those before treatment, and those in the observation group were significantly higher than in the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the levels of serum relaxin (RLX) in both groups were significantly lower than those before treatment (P<0.05), and those in the observation group were significantly lower than in the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the observation group had a prominently higher total effective rate than in the control group ［(93.68%) vs. (78.95%)］ (P<0.05). Conclusion: The joint intervention of extracorporeal electromagnetic stimulation and anal lifting exercise in VLS patients can effectively improve their sexual quality of life, improve vaginal relaxation, and has certain clinical value. |
|
查看全文
下载PDF阅读器 HTML全文 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
