Abstract
Reliability and validity study of ICF assessment of traumatic brain injury
  
DOI:
EN KeyWords: International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health classification (ICF)  traumatic brain injury  reliability  validity
Fund Project:
作者单位
陈琦 南方医科大学南方医院康复科,广州 510515 
范建中 南方医科大学南方医院康复科,广州 510515 
吴红瑛 南方医科大学南方医院康复科,广州 510515 
李德洁 南方医科大学南方医院康复科,广州 510515 
刘夏 南方医科大学南方医院康复科,广州 510515 
View Counts: 9339
PDF Download Counts: 6460
EN Abstract:
  Objective:To study the reliability and validity of the ICF assessment of traumatic brain injury.Methods:All 100 patients,diagnosed as having traumatic brain injury,were evaluated by ICF,Fugl-Meyer upper extremity motor function assessment and modified Barthel Index (MBI).The methods of construct validity and criterion validity were used to study validity,while the methods of assessor reliability and internal consistency were used to study reliability.Kendall's W was used to test the reliability of assessors,and Cronbach's Alpha value was used to analyze content consistency.Pearson correlation was used to test the criterion validity in order to determine the correlation among the three scales.Results:Among the four dimensions of the ICF,Cronbach's Alpha coefficient of activities and participation was 0.927,Cronbach's Alpha coefficient of body function was 0.739,and Kendall's W value was 0.700 (all P<0.05).The Pearson coefficient between physical functioning of the ICF and Fugl-Meyer motor function assessment was 0.754 (P<0.05),showing a negative correlation;while the Pearson coefficient between activities and participation of the ICF and MBI was 0.785 (P<0.05),showing a negative correlation.Conclusion:The ICF of traumatic brain injury has good reliability and validity,which can better reflect the limb motor function and daily life activities.
查看全文   Download PDF Reader  HTML Full Text
Close
本刊微信二维码