Abstract
Effects of surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia: A systemic review and meta-analysis
  
DOI:
EN KeyWords: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation  stroke  dysphagia
Fund Project:武汉大学医学部科研项目资助(2017052)
作者单位
刘晟 武汉大学人民医院心内2科武汉430000 
裴子文 武汉大学健康学院综合模拟康复中心武汉430000 
孟宪梅 武汉大学健康学院综合模拟康复中心武汉430000 
View Counts: 10100
PDF Download Counts: 6515
EN Abstract:
  Objective: To comprehensively evaluate the therapeutic effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on dysphagia after stroke. Methods: This study searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Medline, WOS core collection, CINAHL, EMbase, OCLC, ProQuest, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and CBM about randomized controlled trials (RCT) of the treatment of neuromuscular stimulation on dysphagia after stroke. Cochrane Handbook version 5.1.0 was used to assess trial quality and RevMan 5.3 was used to analyze meta data. Results: A total of 46 RCT were included in this study. There were 30 articles about neuromuscular electrical stimulation with swallowing training vs. swallowing training only, and swallowing function score was used as the outcome measure. The meta analysis showed that SMD=0.60, 95%CI=0.11-1.09 (P< 0.05). There were 7 articles about neuromuscular electrical stimulation with swallowing training vs. swallowing training only, and effective rate was used as the outcome measure. The meta analysis showed that OR=0.21, 95%CI=0.13-0.35 (P<0.05). There were 4 articles on neuromuscular electrical stimulation vs. swallowing training, and the swallowing function score was used as the outcome measure. The meta analysis showed that SMD=0.04, 95%CI=-0.19-0.26 (P>0.05). There were 3 articles on the neuromuscular electrical stimulation vs. acupuncture, and swallowing function score was used as the outcome measures. The meta analysis showed that SMD=0.52, 95%CI=-0.21-1.26 (P>0.05). There were 3 articles on neuromuscular electrical stimulation vs. electroacupuncture, and the swallowing function score was used as the outcome measures. The meta analysis showed that SMD=0.45, 95%CI=-0.31-1.22 (P>0.05). There were 2 articles about neuromuscular electrical stimulation vs. myoelectric feedback, and swallowing function score was used as the outcome measure. The meta analysis showed that SMD=0.77, 95%CI=-0.05-1.58 (P>0.05). Conclusion: There is a statistically significant difference between the swallowing training combined with the neuromuscular electrical stimulation therapy and the swallowing training only. There is no statistically significant difference between the neuromuscular electrical stimulation with swallowing training, the acupuncture, the electroacupuncture, or the electromyographic biofeedback respectively.
查看全文   Download PDF Reader  HTML Full Text
Close
本刊微信二维码