Abstract
Reliability of portable spirometer in lung function test in healthy adults
  
DOI:
EN KeyWords: lung function  spirometry  reliability
Fund Project:2017-2019广州市科技计划项目(201704020140)
作者单位
肖灵君 中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院康复医学科广州 510120 
廖美新 中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院康复医学科广州 510120 
黄粉燕 中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院康复医学科广州 510120 
郭倩 中山大学康复治疗学系广州 510275 
张路路 中山大学康复治疗学系广州 510275 
燕铁斌 中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院康复医学科广州 510120 
View Counts: 12099
PDF Download Counts: 5802
EN Abstract:
  Objective: To check the reliability of lung function test using a portable spirometer in healthy adults. Methods: Thirty healthy adults voluntarily participated in this study. Three-time lung function tests using portable spirometer were carried out to check the inter-rater reliability and test retest reliability of the lung function test parameters. The spirometric test was done to find out the range of values for various lung function parameters including forced vital capacity (FVC), peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced expiratory volume in first second of FVC (FEV1), forced inspiratory volume capacity (FIVC), peak inspiratory flow (PIF), FEV1/FVC, maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), and the reliability between test subjects and retest reliability was tested. Results: In terms of inter tester reliability, ICC values of FVC, PEF, FEV1, FIVC, PIF, FEV1/FVC, MEP and MIP ranged from 0.80 to 0.97, with excellent reliability. In terms of relative reliability, ICC values of FVC, PEF, FEV1, FIVC, PIF, FEV1/FVC, MEP and MIP ranged from 0.86 to 0.97, with excellent reliability. In terms of absolute reliability, the SEM and SEM% values of the evaluation results were 0.28-11.15 and 4.81-13.15%, and MDC and MDC% values were 0.37-30.91 and 13.33-36.46%, respectively. Bland Altman figure showed no systematic error, and no statistical significance was found in the comparison of lung function differences. Conclusion: In summary, portable spirometer could be reliable tools for lung function test in healthy adult.
查看全文   Download PDF Reader  HTML Full Text
Close
本刊微信二维码