Abstract
Effect of Response Elaboration Training Combined with Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Language in Patients with Non-Fluent Aphasia After Stroke
  
DOI:
EN KeyWords: Stroke  Non-fluent aphasia  Response expansion therapy  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Fund Project:
作者单位
赵勇勇 广东省深圳市龙华区中心医院康复医学科深圳 518110 
吴松 广东省深圳市龙华区中心医院康复医学科深圳 518110 
刘思 广东省深圳市龙华区中心医院康复医学科深圳 518110 
李晓雯 广东省深圳市龙华区中心医院康复医学科深圳 518110 
View Counts: 4401
PDF Download Counts: 7357
EN Abstract:
  Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of response elaboration training (RET) combined with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of non-fluent aphasia after stroke. Methods: A total of 90 patients with non-fluent aphasia after stroke admitted to the Rehabilitation Department of our hospital from June, 2018 to December, 2020 were randomly divided into control group and combined group. The control group was given conventional language training and low frequency rTMS treatment. On the basis of the treatment of the control group, the combined group was given RET, and the course of treatment was 4 weeks. Before and after treatment, the scores of Western Aphasia Battery (WAB), Chinese Standard Aphasia Examination tool (CRRCAE) action description score, picture description score and daily life Communication Ability Scale (CADL) were compared between the two groups, and the Boston aphasia diagnostic test (BDAE) grading before and after treatment was compared between the two groups. Results: After treatment, the scores of speech, listening comprehension, retelling, naming and AQ in the two groups increased (P<0.01); the CRRCAE scores of action description, picture description and CADL score in the two groups increased (P<0.01); and the grades of BDAE in the two groups had significant improvement (P<0.01). The scores of speech, listening comprehension, retelling, naming and AQ in the combined group after treatment were higher than those in the control group (P<0.01); the CRRCAE scores of action description, picture description and CADL score in the combined group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.01), and the grades of BDAE in the combined group were better than those in the control group (P<0.05). The differences were statistically significant. Conclusion: The rTMS is an effective rehabilitation treatment for non-fluent aphasia. The RET combined with rTMS can increase the WAB score, RRCAE action description score, picture description score and CADL score, improve the BDAE grade, and it has a significant efficacy in the treatment of non-fluent aphasia after stroke.
查看全文   Download PDF Reader  HTML Full Text
Close
本刊微信二维码