Abstract
Effect of intestinal comprehensive physical therapy on constipation in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury
  
DOI:
EN KeyWords: Spinal cord injury  Neurogenic bowel dysfunction  Constipation  Biofeedback electrical stimulation  Intestinal motility therapy  Comprehensive physical therapy of intestine
Fund Project:
作者单位
李亚楠 1.首都医科大学康复医学院北京 1000682.中国康复研究中心PT2科北京100068 
吴娟 首都医科大学康复医学院北京 100068中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院神经泌尿科北京 100068 
栗亮 1.首都医科大学康复医学院北京 1000682.中国康复研究中心PT2科北京100068 
陈聪 1.首都医科大学康复医学院北京 1000682.中国康复研究中心PT2科北京100068 
靖华芳 中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院神经泌尿科北京 100068 
高轶 中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院神经泌尿科北京 100068 
韩向华 中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院神经泌尿科北京 100068 
王越 中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院神经泌尿科北京 100068 
廖利民 首都医科大学康复医学院北京 100068中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院神经泌尿科北京 100068 
View Counts: 4303
PDF Download Counts: 7083
EN Abstract:
  Objective: To observe the effect of intestinal comprehensive physical therapy on constipation in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury by comparing three methods. Methods: A total of 30 patients with incomplete spinal cord injury who were eligible for inclusion were randomly divided into three groups: A, B and C. On the basis of routine intervention, group A received biofeedback electric stimulation, group B received intestinal exercise therapy, and group C received intestinal comprehensive physical therapy (biofeedback electric stimulation combined with intestinal exercise therapy). The treatment was given once a day, five days a week for four weeks. Before and after treatment, we compared the neurogenic intestinal dysfunction (NBD) score scale, Wexner constipation score scale, PAC-QOL scale, PAC-SYM scale, the dosage of lactulose and glycerine enema, the anorectal manometry and other indicators, and analyzed and evaluated the efficacy. Results: After treatment, the scores of various scales, the dosage of lactulose and glycerine enema in the three groups were significantly reduced (P<0.01), the anal systolic pressure was significantly increased (P<0.01), and the rectal volume perception threshold was significantly reduced (P<0.05) as compared with those before treatment. There was no statistically significant difference in the anal resting pressure before and after treatment (P>0.05). After treatment, the scores of various scales, the dosage of lactulose and glycerine enema in group C were significantly lower than those in group A and group B (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between group A and group B (P>0.05). There was no significant difference among the three groups in the indicators of rectal manometry (P>0.05). Conclusion: The three methods can improve the constipation symptoms of patients with incomplete spinal cord injury. Intestinal comprehensive physical therapy is more effective than biofeedback electrical stimulation and intestinal exercise therapy alone in improving constipation after incomplete spinal cord injury.
查看全文   Download PDF Reader  HTML Full Text
Close
本刊微信二维码