Abstract
Effect of extracorporeal shock wave acupoint shock therapy on hemiplegic shoulder pain
  
DOI:
EN KeyWords: stroke  shoulder pain  extracorporeal shock wave
Fund Project:2018年度山东省高等学校科研发展计划项目(J18KB130)
作者单位
王方琪 山东中医药大学康复医学院济南 250300 
岳昭娣 山东中医药大学康复医学院济南 250300 
景珩 济宁市第一人民医院康复医学科山东 济宁 272000 
李玲玲 山东中医药大学康复医学院济南 250300 
刘志遥 山东中医药大学康复医学院济南 250300 
石鑫 山东中医药大学康复医学院济南 250300 
黄海量 山东中医药大学康复医学院济南 250300 
View Counts: 3133
PDF Download Counts: 3322
EN Abstract:
  Objective: To observe the effect of extracorporeal shock wave acupoint shock therapy on hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP). Methods: A total of 54 HSP patients who met the standards were selected and randomly divided into 3 groups with 18 cases each. The control group was treated with routine rehabilitation therapy, the observation group A was treated with extracorporeal shock wave pain point therapy, and the observation group B was treated with extracorporeal shock wave acupoint shock therapy on the basis of the observation group A. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Upper Limb Fugl Meyer Motor Function Assessment (U-FMA) and pain-free Passive Joint Range of Motion (PROM) of shoulder flexion, abduction, and external rotation were compared among the three groups before treatment, after treatment, and during the follow-up period. Results: After treatment and during follow-up, the VAS scores in three groups were lower than those before treatment (P<0.05). U-FMA scores and pain-free PROM of flexion, abduction and external rotation were higher than those before treatment (P<0.05). After treatment, the VAS scores in the observation group A and observation group B were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05), the pain-free PROM of flexion in the observation group A and pain-free PROM of flexion and abduction in the observation group B were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). During the follow-up period, the VAS scores in the observation group A and observation group B were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05), and those in the observation group B were lower than those in the observation group A (P<0.05). The U-FMA scores in the observation group A and observation group B were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The pain-free PROM of flexion and abduction in the observation group A and observation group B was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05), and that of flexion, abduction and external rotation in the observation group B was higher than in the observation group A (P<0.05). Conclusion: Both traditional extracorporeal shock wave therapy and extracorporeal shock wave acupoint therapy are beneficial to the improvement of pain degree, pain-free PROM of shoulder joint and motor function of upper limb in patients with HSP, and the effect of extracorporeal shock wave acupoint therapy is better.
查看全文   Download PDF Reader  HTML Full Text
Close
本刊微信二维码