| Objective: To compare the effects of power training combined with routine training (PRT) and routine training alone (RT) on motor symptoms, strength, balance, functional performance, and quality of life in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods: A total of 39 patients ［Hoehn and Yahr=1-3; Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale-III (UPDRS-III)=21.61±7.64］ were randomly assigned to the PRT group (n=20) or RT group (n=19) involving 3 times/week (Monday, Wednesday, Friday) of supervised training for 4 weeks. Including stretching, strength, balance, gait trainingas in the RT group, 6 instruments were used to provide low-load, high-velocity power training for the PRT group. The UPDRS-III, quadriceps femoris extension (E) and hamstring flexion (F) peak torque (PT), total power (TP), and average torque (AT), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up-and-Go test (TUGT), 5 times sit-to-stand test (FTSST), and the 39-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) were measured at baseline and on the day after the completion of 4-week training. Results: Both training groups showed significantly better scores (P<0.05) on the UPDRS-III, EPT, ETP, EAT, FPT, BBS, FTSST, and PDQ-39 after training. No significant differences were detected between the PRT and RT groups. Conclusion: Both PRT and RT programs can significantly improve physical performance and quality of life in patients with PD. PRT showed no advantage over RT. |
