Abstract
Effect of mirror therapy combined with rhythmic auditory stimulation on upper limb motor functions in hemiplegic patients after stroke
  
DOI:10.3870/zgkf.2025.02.004
EN KeyWords: mirror therapy  rhythmic auditory stimulation  stroke  surface electromyography  upper limb function
Fund Project:上海市宝山区科学技术委员会科技创新专项资金项目(21-E-65);上海市宝山区医学重点专科及(A类)特色品牌建设项目(BSZK-2023-A17)
作者单位
施伯瀚 上海市第二康复医院神经康复科上海 200441 
马书杰 上海市第二康复医院神经康复科上海 200441 
任宁娜 上海市第二康复医院神经康复科上海 200441 
唐燕甫 上海市第二康复医院神经康复科上海 200441 
徐倩 上海市第二康复医院神经康复科上海 200441 
王萍 上海市第二康复医院神经康复科上海 200441 
朱薇嘉 上海市第二康复医院神经康复科上海 200441 
朱燕 上海市第二康复医院神经康复科上海 200441 
View Counts: 1198
PDF Download Counts: 789
EN Abstract:
  Objective: To explore the effect of mirror therapy combined with rhythmic auditory stimulation on the recovery of upper limb function in patients with hemiplegia after stroke. Methods: A total of 81 patients with upper limb dysfunction following stroke were selected as research subjects, and divided into three groups (each with 27 cases) according to the random number table method: conventional rehabilitation group, mirror therapy group, and combined treatment group. Each patient received conventional intervention and rehabilitation treatment. The mirror therapy group was given mirror therapy intervention + the conventional rehabilitation group, and the combined treatment group was subjected to mirror therapy + rhythmic auditory stimulation + the conventional rehabilitation. Patients in each group received 4 weeks of treatment. The Fugl-Meyer motor assessment scale-upper extremity (FMA-UE) and surface electromyography (sEMG) were used to evaluate the electromyographic signal values - root mean square (RMS) of the biceps and triceps muscles on the paralyzed side, modified Barthel index (MBI), and modified Ashworth scale (MAS) were used to assess the patients before and after treatment, and the data were statistically analyzed. Results: Before treatment, there were no significant differences in FMA-UE scores, MAS grading, RMS, and MBI scores among the three groups. After a 4-week treatment period, intra-group comparisons among the three groups showed that the FMA-UE scores, MAS grades, and MBI scores were all improved compared to pre-treatment, with significant differences (P<0.05). The mirror therapy group had superior FMA-UE and MBI scores to the conventional group (P<0.05). The combined therapy group showed significantly higher FMA-UE and MBI scores than the conventional group and the mirror therapy group (P<0.05). The number of cases showing improvement in MAS grade in the combined therapy group was significantly greater than in the conventional and mirror therapy groups (P<0.05). Additionally, there was no significant difference in MAS grade between the mirror therapy group and the conventional group. Concurrently, post-treatment RMS of the biceps brachii on the affected side decreased, and RMS of the triceps brachii increased compared to pre-treatment in all three groups (P<0.05). The combined therapy group showed a more significant increase in RMS of both the biceps brachii and triceps brachii compared to the conventional and mirror therapy groups, with significant differences (P<0.05). Conclusion: The combination of mirror therapy and rhythmic auditory stimulation can effectively promote the improvement of upper limb function in patients with hemiplegia after stroke and enhance the ability to perform activities of daily living.
查看全文   Download PDF Reader  HTML Full Text
Close
本刊微信二维码